Vaccines studies relating to Influenza.

Your conclusion is confusing. You write: ”Universal immunization of healthy adults is not supported by the results of this review.“ If so, why the first sentence? You wrote in the Discussion that ”serologically confirmed cases of influenza are only part of the spectumof clinical effectiveness.“ Furthermore, it would be helpful if you had explained the difference between influenza and influenza-likeillness in the abstract. Also, the title of the synopsis is inaccurate. Why say ”not enough evidence“ when there are so many trials inyour review? It should read: Clinical trials do not support the universal recommendation, etc....https://www.academia.edu/30152248/Vaccines_for_preventing_influenza_in_healthy_adults?email_work_card=title